Difference between revisions of "Synonymy"
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Wimmer and Altmann (2001a) took a random sample (15 pages) from the Italian dictionary of P. Stopelli, Sinonimi e Contrari con generici, Spezifici, Analoghi, Inversi. (Garzanti 1998) and obtained the distribution as presented in Table 1. Separartely they used the dictionary of P. Giovanelli, W. Frenzel, Langenscheidts Handwörterbuch Italienisch (Berlin, Langenscheid 1998) from wich thay sampled words with 0 synonyms (i.e. those not occurring in the dictionary of synonyms but laying between the synonyms on the given page). The results of fitting of (3) and (4) to these data are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. | Wimmer and Altmann (2001a) took a random sample (15 pages) from the Italian dictionary of P. Stopelli, Sinonimi e Contrari con generici, Spezifici, Analoghi, Inversi. (Garzanti 1998) and obtained the distribution as presented in Table 1. Separartely they used the dictionary of P. Giovanelli, W. Frenzel, Langenscheidts Handwörterbuch Italienisch (Berlin, Langenscheid 1998) from wich thay sampled words with 0 synonyms (i.e. those not occurring in the dictionary of synonyms but laying between the synonyms on the given page). The results of fitting of (3) and (4) to these data are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. | ||
− | + | <div align="center">[[Image:Tabelle11_S.jpg]]</div> | |
− | |||
− | |||
<div align="center">[[Image:Grafik1_S.jpg]]</div> | <div align="center">[[Image:Grafik1_S.jpg]]</div> | ||
Line 75: | Line 73: | ||
Ziegler analyzed German data using Der Duden Bd. 8 (1997, second edition) and obtained results presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2. Since for x = 34 to x = 71 there are no observed cases, the only case in x = 72 was pooled with that of x = 33. The present results are slightly different from those in Ziegler (2001) | Ziegler analyzed German data using Der Duden Bd. 8 (1997, second edition) and obtained results presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2. Since for x = 34 to x = 71 there are no observed cases, the only case in x = 72 was pooled with that of x = 33. The present results are slightly different from those in Ziegler (2001) | ||
− | + | <div align="center">[[Image:Tabelle22_S.jpg]]</div> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<div align="center">[[Image:Grafik2_S.jpg]]</div> | <div align="center">[[Image:Grafik2_S.jpg]]</div> |
Revision as of 10:09, 3 July 2006
1. Problem and history
Two words are synonymous if they have the same meaning. Even if absolute synonymy is seldom, approximate synonymy is usual in specific contexts. Synonymy arises through (→) diversification of the meaning of words and can be eliminated by unification (cf. Altmann 1986).
From this point of view the problem has been analyzed merely by Wimmer and Altmann (2001a) who studied the synonymy in Italian and Ziegler (2001a) who studied it in German and English.
2. Hypothesis
The rise and elimination of synonyms is controled by a birth-and-death process.
3. Derivation
3.1. Wimmer-Altmann´s model
The dynamics of synonymy is a Poissonian birth-and-death process with constant birth (λ) and death rates (μ) respectively. Inserting them in the balancing equation we obtain
(1)
Stepwise solution and setting q = λ/μ, (0 < q < 1) yields the geometric distribution
(2)
Since words with 0 synonyms are not contained in the usual dictionary of synonyms, one either uses the 1-displaced geometric distribution which can be arrived at by a displacement in (1), i.e.
(3)
or one takes these words with 0 synonymy from a usual but incommensurable dictionary. In that case it is advisable to modify (2) and use
(4)
Example: Synonymy in Italian
Wimmer and Altmann (2001a) took a random sample (15 pages) from the Italian dictionary of P. Stopelli, Sinonimi e Contrari con generici, Spezifici, Analoghi, Inversi. (Garzanti 1998) and obtained the distribution as presented in Table 1. Separartely they used the dictionary of P. Giovanelli, W. Frenzel, Langenscheidts Handwörterbuch Italienisch (Berlin, Langenscheid 1998) from wich thay sampled words with 0 synonyms (i.e. those not occurring in the dictionary of synonyms but laying between the synonyms on the given page). The results of fitting of (3) and (4) to these data are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1.
The fitting in both cases is very satisfactory.
3.2. Ziegler´s model
Ziegler (2001) ascertained that for German and English data the assumptions in 3.1 are not sufficient. Using the same process he postulated
and obtained the balancing equations in form
(5)
leading by stepwise addition of lines to
(6)
Setting a/b = k and b = q one obtains
(7)
resulting in the negative binomial distribution. Displacing it conventionally one step to the right one gets
(8)
Example. Synonymy in German dictionary
Ziegler analyzed German data using Der Duden Bd. 8 (1997, second edition) and obtained results presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2. Since for x = 34 to x = 71 there are no observed cases, the only case in x = 72 was pooled with that of x = 33. The present results are slightly different from those in Ziegler (2001)
Note. For English neither (4) nor (8) were sufficient, perhaps because of the extensive language mixture. Ziegler proposed the mixed negative binomial distribution.
4. Authors: G. Altmann
5. References
Der Duden Bd. 8 (). Duden. Die sinn- und sachverwandte Wörter. Synonymwörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Giovanelli, P., Frenzel, W. (1998). Langenscheidts Handwörterbuch Italienisch. Berlin: Langenscheid.
Stopelli, P. (1998). Sinonimi e contrari con generici, spezifici, analoghi, inversi. Milano: Garzanti.
The Nuttall (1). The Nuttall dictionary of English synonyms and antonyms. Ed. by G.E. Christ. Ner York-London: Warne.
Wimmer, G., Altmann, G. (2001a). Two hypotheses on synonymy. In: Ondrejovič, S., Považaj, M. (eds.), Lexicographica ´99: 218-225. Bratislava: Veda.
Ziegler, A. (2001a). Zum Gesetz der Synonymie. Modellanpassungen im Deutschen und Englischen. In: Ondrejovič, S., Považaj, M. (eds.), Lexicographica ´99: 230-236 . Bratislava: Veda